RankingRight
Home / Software & Apps / AI Writing Tools / Cheapest AI Writing Tools
AI writing

Cheapest AI Writing Tools

Only the tools that fit "cheapest ai writing tool", given the same six briefs and scored blind.

Under $20
81 people visited this site this week 1

Claude (Pro) - The best long-form and technical writing in our test, with Projects that hold your style guide and source material across a whole body of work Tested Aug 2026 by Team RankingRight

  • Both editors ranked its technical explainer and long-form draft first
  • Held the brief and the tone across 1,500 words without drifting
  • Projects keep a style guide and source documents attached to everything you write
Very Good 8.8 Visit Site
$0 · checked Sep 11 20 USD/mo Yes, limited daily usage
2

ChatGPT (Plus) - The most versatile of the lot: writing, images, data analysis, browsing and custom GPTs in one subscription, with the largest ecosystem around it Tested Aug 2026 by Team RankingRight

  • Scored level with Claude on editing needed across the six briefs
  • Images, charts, data analysis and browsing in the same subscription
  • Custom GPTs let a team share a configured writer
Very Good 8.7 Visit Site
$0 · checked Sep 11 20 USD/mo Yes, limited
3

Grammarly (Pro) - The editor rather than the writer: it works inside every app you already type in and makes your own writing clearer Tested Aug 2026 by Team RankingRight

  • Works in Gmail, Docs, Word, Slack and the browser — no copying between tools
  • Caught every real grammar issue our editors flagged in the rewrite brief
  • $12 a month, and the free tier is genuinely useful
Good 8.4 Visit Site
$0 · checked Sep 11 12 USD/mo Yes, grammar and spelling
4

Notion AI (Business add-on) - Writing inside the documents your team already keeps, with your own wiki as the context — summarise, draft and rewrite without leaving the page Tested Aug 2026 by Team RankingRight

  • Answers from your own wiki and cites the page it took them from
  • No copying between a chat window and a document
  • $10 a member on top of a plan you already pay for
Fair 7.9 Visit Site
$10 · checked Sep 11 10 USD/mo Trial credits on free Notion plans
5

Writesonic (Individual) - SEO-first drafting: it pulls the live search results for a keyword and builds an article brief around them before it writes Tested Aug 2026 by Team RankingRight

  • Builds an outline from the current top-ranking pages for a keyword
  • Cites the sources it browsed, which made fact-checking faster
  • Bulk article generation and a WordPress publisher
Fair 7.8 Visit Site
$0 · checked Sep 11 39 USD/mo Yes, limited credits
6

Copy.ai (Starter) - A workflow engine more than a writer: it chains research, drafting and enrichment into repeatable go-to-market automations Tested Aug 2026 by Team RankingRight

  • Workflows repeat a whole process — research a company, draft an email, enrich a list
  • Infobase stores product facts so output stays consistent
  • Free tier of 2,000 words a month
Fair 7.7 Visit Site
$0 · checked Sep 11 49 USD/mo Yes, 2,000 words/mo

More to consider

These 6 come from retailer catalogs. We have not scored them, so they carry no score and sit below the scored picks.

Master Content Writing with ChatGPT, SEO, and AI Tools Master Content Writing with ChatGPT, SEO, and AI Tools Udemy · listed at $19.99 on Oct 5 A course teaching content writing with ChatGPT and SEO tools, priced under $20. View at Udemy →
Technical Writing Fundamentals - Aerospace & Software Domain Technical Writing Fundamentals - Aerospace & Software Domain Udemy · listed at $19.99 on Oct 3 A course on technical writing fundamentals for those entering the writing field, priced under $20. View at Udemy →
Arabic and Quran (Reading and Writing) Arabic and Quran (Reading and Writing) Udemy · listed at $19.99 on Oct 3 A course covering reading and writing in Arabic and Quran, priced under $20. View at Udemy →
The Ultimate Guide to Writing Viral Blog Posts The Ultimate Guide to Writing Viral Blog Posts Udemy · listed at $199.99 on Oct 4 A guide to writing viral blog posts for people who want to produce more content. View at Udemy →
Ultimate Blogging Roadmap: Blog + Content Writing Pro Tips Ultimate Blogging Roadmap: Blog + Content Writing Pro Tips Udemy · listed at $49.99 on Oct 4 A blogging roadmap course with content writing tips for making a blog stand out. View at Udemy →
Blog Post Writing Made Simple - Blogging Methods That Work Blog Post Writing Made Simple - Blogging Methods That Work Udemy · listed at $94.99 on Oct 4 A blog post writing course with methods for writing about unfamiliar subjects. View at Udemy →

What separates the cheapest AI writing tools on this page?

Price is not the dividing line here. Claude and ChatGPT both sit at $20, and they scored 8.8 and 8.7. Grammarly costs $12 and scored 8.4. Notion AI costs $10 and scored 7.9. Writesonic is $39 at 7.8, and Copy.ai is $49 at 7.7.

The real split is what each tool does with your words. Claude held a brief and tone across 1,500 words without drifting, and its Projects keep a style guide and source documents attached. ChatGPT matched it on editing needed across the six briefs, and adds images, charts, data analysis and browsing in the same subscription. Grammarly is the editor, not the writer: it works inside Gmail, Docs, Word, Slack and the browser, and caught every real grammar issue our editors flagged. As a generative writer it scored 5.

Notion AI answers from your own wiki and cites the page it took the answer from, but long-form drafting sits behind the dedicated tools. Writesonic builds an outline from the current top-ranking pages for a keyword and cites the sources it browsed, though its prose scored 5 on editing. Copy.ai chains research, drafting and enrichment into repeatable workflows, and its long-form drafts needed the most editing after Grammarly.

What should you check before buying a cheap AI writing tool?

Our scoring puts output quality at 30, control and brand voice at 20, workflow and integrations at 20, accuracy and disclosure at 15, and value at 15. Read your own priorities against that order.

  • Editing time. Claude and ChatGPT scored level on editing needed. Writesonic and Copy.ai both scored 5 on prose, so budget time there.
  • Where you already type. Grammarly works in the apps you use; Notion AI only helps if your team is already in Notion.
  • Training on your chats. ChatGPT's consumer tiers train on your chats unless you turn it off.
  • Real cost. Writesonic's credit system makes the real cost hard to predict, and Copy.ai's free tier is 2,000 words a month before the $49 plan.
  • Voice drift. ChatGPT drifted toward generic marketing language on two briefs, and Grammarly suggestions can flatten a distinctive voice if accepted wholesale.

Which one for whom?

Claude suits long-form and technical writing where a style guide and source material need to stay attached. ChatGPT suits teams that want writing, images, data analysis, browsing and custom GPTs in one subscription. Grammarly suits anyone who wants their own writing made clearer inside the apps they already use. Notion AI suits teams whose wiki already lives in Notion. Writesonic suits SEO-first drafting around live search results. Copy.ai suits go-to-market teams that want repeatable workflows rather than one-off drafts.

For long-form and technical work, Claude keeps your style guide and sources attached. ChatGPT covers writing, images, data analysis and browsing in one $20 subscription, while Grammarly at $12 fixes what you already write. Notion AI fits teams already in Notion, Writesonic fits SEO-first drafting, and Copy.ai fits repeatable go-to-market workflows.

Questions about cheapest ai writing tools

Will Google penalise AI-written content?
Google has said it rewards helpful, reliable content however it is produced, and penalises content made primarily to game rankings. In practice that means an AI draft a human has verified and improved is fine, and bulk unedited output is not. Every tool here produced at least one confident factual error in our six briefs, so the checking is not optional.
Which tool needed the least editing?
Claude and ChatGPT tied at 3 out of 10 on our editing scale, with Claude preferred by both editors for long-form and technical explanations and ChatGPT for range and speed. Jasper was close behind on marketing copy specifically, which is what it is tuned for.
Does the tool train on what I write?
It depends on the plan. Consumer tiers of several tools use conversations to improve models unless you opt out; business and team tiers generally do not. We recorded each vendor's stated position in the specs, but it changes often — read the current terms before putting client or confidential material into any of them.
How do you test AI writing tools?
Six briefs go to every tool with identical wording and no follow-up prompting. Two editors score each output blind for accuracy, usefulness and tone, and rate how much editing it would need before publishing, from 0 to 10. We fact-check every checkable claim, then test brand voice controls, integrations and export, and price one writer producing about 20 pieces a month.

*Scores: Output quality 30 · Control & brand voice 20 · Workflow & integrations 20 · Accuracy & disclosure 15 · Value 15; score = Σ ÷ 10. Prices shown were checked on the date beside each and may change. Affiliate links are added only after a score is locked and can never change it. How we rank.

#1 Claude8.8 · $0
Visit Site