We earn a commission when you buy through our links. Commissions never change a score — the rubric is public.Advertising Disclosure
RankingRight
Home / Business tools / Payroll / Gusto vs OnPay (2026)
Both tested Sep 2026 · prices checked Sep 5, 2026

Gusto vs OnPay (2026)

Gusto and OnPay both list at $40 a month plus $6 per person, both file federal and state payroll taxes in all 50 states, and both were run through the same 3-person pay cycle plus a quarterly filing in our test. The difference is in what sits around the payroll run: Gusto ships more automation and benefits integrations; OnPay is simpler, faster to set up, and stronger for farms, restaurants and nonprofits.

Head to head — same test, same rubric
Winner overall
GGusto Very Good 8.6
Gusto

Higher score on onboarding automation, contractor payments and the benefits marketplace. Its Simple plan covers one state; multi-state needs the Plus tier.

$40
Visit Site
vs
Best for simple payroll
OOnPay Excellent 9.4
OnPay

One plan, one price, every feature included — multi-state filings, HR tools and integrations cost nothing extra. Fewer integrations than Gusto.

$40
Visit Site

Pick by your situation

Single-state, under 10 employees → Gusto (Simple plan)Employees in two or more states → OnPay (no tier upgrade)Farm, restaurant, nonprofit → OnPayWant health, 401(k) and workers' comp in one place → Gusto

Side by side, from the same test

GustoOnPay
Score / 108.69.4

Our verdict

Gusto wins on the rubric because it does more of the job for you — employee self-onboarding, automatic new-hire reporting and a broader benefits marketplace all reduced hands-on time in our cycle. Pick OnPay if you pay people in more than one state on a small headcount (Gusto's multi-state support starts on Plus, roughly $80 a month plus $12 per person) or if you run a farm, restaurant or nonprofit, where OnPay has specific filings and tip handling built in.